SQL & Reporting
SQL development, stored procedures, and enterprise reporting services
Iseyon designs and builds data platforms for volumes, arrival rates and variety that break conventional tools, then hands them to your engineers to run.

A workload becomes a big data problem when its volume, its arrival rate or its variety breaks the tool that used to handle it. The symptoms are recognizable. A nightly batch no longer finishes before the business day. A database cannot hold full history at the grain analysts want. Event streams arrive faster than anything downstream can consume them, or the warehouse has no answer for text, images, logs and telemetry. Iseyon designs and builds the architecture that handles those conditions, then hands it over as something your engineers can operate.
Distributed processing frameworks such as Apache Spark sit under most of this work, alongside cloud object storage, stream transports like Apache Kafka, and open table formats that make large file collections behave like tables. The discipline around the technology matters more than the choice of it. That discipline is where Iseyon spends its time.
Iseyon assesses what exists before proposing anything: current pipelines and their real runtimes, where data quality actually fails, what the business cannot answer today, and which constraints are technical and which are organizational. We sequence the roadmap so each phase delivers something the business can use on its own, starting with the first.
Iseyon designs for the access patterns the data has to serve. We separate storage from compute so each scales on its own terms. We choose batch, micro-batch or streaming per pipeline, on the merits of that pipeline. Partitioning and file layout follow how the data is queried, and we use open table formats where the workload needs transactional guarantees over object storage. We size deliberately, since over-provisioning is the usual first draft of a cost problem.
Iseyon builds ingestion and transformation that behave predictably under failure. Loads are incremental and idempotent, so a rerun produces the same result with no duplicates. Schema changes are handled inside the pipeline. Data quality expectations are declared alongside the transformation, and lineage runs from the serving table back to the source. We design for late and out-of-order data at the start, because retrofitting it means rebuilding the pipeline.
Iseyon builds event-driven pipelines on stream transports such as Apache Kafka, with stream processing on top. The work covers topic and partition design, delivery semantics chosen for the use case, watermarking and windowing for late arrivals, and replay from the log when something downstream has to be rebuilt. We apply streaming where a decision genuinely cannot wait. It costs more to run and more to operate than batch, so it has to earn its place.
Iseyon connects big data platforms to machine learning workflows for forecasting, recommendation, segmentation and anomaly detection. Features come from the same governed tables that feed reporting, so training and serving stay aligned. Model deployment, monitoring and retraining paths ship as part of the delivery.
Iseyon implements cataloging and classification, access control at table, row and column level, and masking or tokenization for sensitive fields. Encryption covers data in transit and at rest, retention and deletion follow your obligations, and audit logging is something a reviewer can actually use. We build governance during the project, with your security and compliance teams involved from the design stage.
Iseyon builds on the major cloud platforms using managed services where they reduce operational burden and self-managed components where control matters more. We use elastic compute, object storage tiering and separation of workloads by criticality, so a heavy ad hoc query cannot starve a production pipeline.
Iseyon profiles before tuning: skew and spill in distributed jobs, small file problems, shuffle behavior, cluster sizing against actual utilization, and storage tiering for cold data. We tag cost so it is attributable per team or product, and we alert on anomalies so monitoring catches a runaway job the day it runs. The invoice should hold no surprises.
Iseyon migrates legacy data platforms in stages. We map dependencies, rebuild the pipelines that earn their place and retire the rest, run old and new in parallel with reconciliation until the numbers agree, then move consumers across in groups. Decommissioning the old estate is planned into the work, since running both platforms indefinitely erases the reason for moving.
Iseyon leaves behind architecture documentation with the reasoning behind each decision, runbooks for the failure modes seen during the build, and catalog and access administration. Your engineers also get the cost model with the levers that move it, and enablement to extend the platform. The engagement is finished when your team can add the next pipeline without us.
| Layer | Legacy Approach | Cloud-Native Alternative | Why It Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Storage | HDFS on-premises | Cloud object storage (S3, ADLS, GCS) | Decouples storage from compute, so capacity and processing scale independently |
| Processing | Hadoop MapReduce | Apache Spark on cloud runtimes | In-memory processing across stages, with intermediate results kept off disk |
| Streaming / ingestion | Apache Flume and Sqoop | Apache Kafka with Spark Streaming or Flink | A durable, replayable log for event ingestion, so consumers can replay history on demand |
| Orchestration | Apache Oozie | Apache Airflow or managed cloud workflow services | Dependency graphs defined in code, with retries, backfills and integrations that are practical to maintain |
| Analytics and BI | HiveQL batch queries | Spark SQL and open table formats over object storage | Interactive query performance and transactional guarantees on top of files |
| Governance / metadata | Hand-rolled scripts or Atlas | Unified catalogs with lineage and fine-grained access control | Discovery, lineage and permissions administered in one place |
| Deployment model | On-premise Hadoop clusters | Cloud data lakes and lakehouses | Elastic capacity and managed infrastructure, so cluster maintenance stops competing with delivery work |
Find answers to common questions about our services
Discover more about our solutions and expertise
Tell us what is breaking. We will tell you how we would fix it, and what it would cost.
Get Started Today